My Father and I were really excited about this new magazine called Entertainment Weekly that was launching in early 1990. My old man had a subscription (is this now an obsolete term?) to Sports Illustrated that advertised this new mag and we both thought it sounded fantastic. Well, now it's 2017 and the fascination is definitely over. When it started, I thought the reviews of TV, Film, Music and Books were very insightful and the in-depth articles about behind-the-scenes information about artists and various looks at how these forms of art are made were wonderful. The editors (I'm guessing) also made a somewhat controversial decision to publish an end-of-the year issue with not only the "Best Of" articles but also had several pages devoted to the people in front of and behind the scenes in all entertainment fields who had succumbed to the (then) death sentence of AIDS during the previous year.
My college years, which lasted from 1990 to 1995, would have been so more much more boring without these issues arriving in the mailbox every week or so. The writers turned me on to TV, music, film and books that I had no idea even existed.
Over the years, the writers changed and the articles become shorter while the pictures and increasingly worthless "Best Of" lists become even larger, eventually edging out real entertainment news content in favor of a more exploitative 'who's maybe doing this movie' or even 'who's sleeping with what' types of stories that I'm guessing the kids today go ga-ga about.
Of course, online sources of true entertainment news are so numerous now that I just won't count them for you (It's 3267). So, yes, after 27 years, your Father and I believe it's time that you leave the nest and start being read (or looked at) by other people. You'll thank us later.